Conkle Kremer & Engel

Add to Favorites

Attorneys, Accident & Property Damage Attorneys, Business Law Attorneys

Be the first to review!

(310) 998-9100Call Visit WebsiteVisit Website Map & DirectionsDirections3130 Wilshire Blvd Ste 500Santa Monica, CA 90403 Write a ReviewWrite Review

Is this your business?

Customize this page.

Claim This Business

Hours

Regular Hours

Mon - Fri:	8:30 am - 5:30 pm

Places Near Santa Monica with Attorneys

Venice (6 miles)
Marina Del Rey (7 miles)
Culver City (7 miles)
Beverly Hills (8 miles)
West Hollywood (12 miles)
Sherman Oaks (13 miles)
Encino (13 miles)
Studio City (14 miles)
Inglewood (14 miles)
El Segundo (14 miles)

More Info

Email

Extra Phones

TollFree: (800) 998-9107

Neighborhoods

West Los Angeles, Mid-City

AKA

Olesten, Christina

Conkle & Olesten

Conkle & Olesten Attys

Christine Olesten Attorney

Other Links

https://www.conklelaw.com

http://conklelaw.com

Categories

Attorneys, Accident & Property Damage Attorneys, Business Law Attorneys, Business Litigation Attorneys, Construction Law Attorneys, Criminal Law Attorneys, Domestic Violence Attorneys, Employment Discrimination Attorneys, General Practice Attorneys, Labor & Employment Law Attorneys, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Attorneys, Real Estate Attorneys, Sexual Harassment Attorneys

GalleryView all (1)

Gallery Image Number 1

Reviews

Hi there!
Be the first to review!

Click to Rate

Details

Phone: (310) 998-9100

Address: 3130 Wilshire Blvd Ste 500, Santa Monica, CA 90403

Website: https://www.conklelaw.com

People Also Viewed

View similar Attorneys

Suggest an Edit

Conkle Kremer & Engel

Embezzlement
Restraining Order
Represented a freight forwarder whose employees left to join a competitor, bringing customer lists. Â Defended wage and hour cross-claims by departed employees. Â We obtained a Temporary Restraining Order and settlement including monetary recovery and a â€œno contactâ€ list of customers and employees.

Business and Corporate Law

Business Disputes
Conkle, Kremer & Engel has helped clients improve their contracts and strengthen their rights to arbitrate or litigate in their own territory, rather than become mired in proceedings elsewhere. Our trial lawyers have obtained multi-million dollar judgments and injunctions in business disputes. We have successfully resolved contract, fraud, secured transaction, purchase and sale, real property, racketeering, securities, corporate, partnership, employment and professional liability claims.
Trade Secrets
CK&E provides full service for its business clients, including contract negotiation and dispute resolution, employment issues, disputes over sales commissions, trade secret protection and compelling insurers to live up to the promises of their insurance policies and the requirements of California law.
Intellectual Property
Â Â CK&E made a presentation to the National Intellectual Property Law Institute, in Washington D.C. Manufacturers and distributors learned of a variety of civil remedies available to enforce their rights against product counterfeiting. See CK&E’s NIPLI presentation
Unfair Competition
Conkle, Kremer & Engel prosecutes and defends claims of unfair competition, such as under California Business & Professions Code section 17200. Â We also advise businesses about proper labeling and advertising strategies to ensure compliance with state and federal laws and to minimize the risks of claims of false or misleading advertising.Â Our experience includes defending against both individual claims and class action lawsuits that product labeling or advertising violates Californiaâ€™s Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law.
Antitrust

Wrongful Termination
Conkle, Kremer & Engel has a strong record of success in providing effective and creative counsel on a full range of traditional and emerging labor and employment issues.Â Over the years, we have advised clients on numerous issues including but not limited to: employment agreements, covenants not to compete, ERISA litigation, trade-secret matters, wrongful termination, compensation disputes and employment discrimination issues.
Employment Discrimination
Conkle, Kremer & Engel has a strong record of success in providing effective and creative counsel on a full range of traditional and emerging labor and employment issues.Â Over the years, we have advised clients on numerous issues including employment agreements, non-disclosure agreements, covenants not to compete, wage and hour claims, commission disputes, ERISA litigation, sexual harassment, trade secret matters, wrongful termination and employment discrimination issues.Â Read More
Employment Contract
Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta, (Case No. 20-15291) 2023 WL 2013326 (9th Cir. Feb. 15, 2023), ruled that AB 51, a California law effectively prohibiting and criminalizing mandatory arbitration provisions in employment agreements, is invalid because it is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).
Employment Litigation
California employers should welcome this decision. The decision clarifies that businesses have broader freedom to contract as they see fit, and that it is permissible, even in California, to require employees to sign mandatory arbitration provisions as a condition of employment. The overall perception is that arbitration results in faster, less expensive resolution of employee-employer disputes, and keeps employment disputes out of California courts. Still, there are other schools of thought that believe that employment arbitrations can be more expensive for employers than the courts because private arbitrators often charge high hourly rates, the fees and costs of the arbitration must be advanced by employers, and dispositive motion victories (for example, a successful motion to dismiss a frivolous claim) are less common in arbitration. As well, even if arbitration is enforceable some employees may file their claims in court in the hope that the employer fails to take action to enforce arbitration.
Sexual Harassment
Defended a bookkeeper’s claims of sexual harassment, wrongful termination and employment discrimination against a military supplier who was pursuing claims of embezzlement against the bookkeeper. Â Resulted in settlements with no recovery for bookkeeper on her employment claims, and recovery for our client from the bookkeeper and two large banks of the entire amount of the embezzlement. Â We were able to utilize insurance proceeds to achieve settlement with net positive recovery for our client.

Real Estate Litigation
Construction Litigation
Conkle, Kremer & Engel has substantial experience enforcing rights of parties to real property transactions, including buy-sell transactions, commercial tenancies, easements and other issues. Conkle, Kremer & Engel also provides a wide variety of services to resolve disputes concerning construction, from construction defects to nonpayment, including liens and contractor licensing issues. Our lawyers are particularly attuned to the potential for insurance benefits in real estate and construction disputes, both for the costs of defense of claims and for any damages assessed. We have successfully resolved construction and real property disputes informally, as well as in arbitration and court trials.
Easement
Property Damage
Â Â Conkle, Kremer & Engel won an appellate court decision establishing a right of a subsequent property owner to collect insurance for damage to real property that started before the property was purchased. Conkle, Kremer & Engel represented a purchaser of a retirement park. The purchaser and the prior owner were sued by tenants who claimed property damage due to negligent construction. CK&E represented the purchaser against the contractor who caused the damage, and won a judgment at trial of $847,671. CK&E then filed an action to collect the $847,671 from the contractor’s insurer. The insurer refused to pay, contending that the purchaser did not own the property when the damage occurred. CK&E obtained a decision from the California Court of Appeal that the insurance company was wrong. The insurer is obligated to pay the amount of the award because the damage occurred during the term of the insurance policy, even though the purchaser did not own the property until later.

View All Services

Provided by