Tanner Associates

Add to Favorites

Attorneys, Business Law Attorneys, Business Litigation Attorneys

Be the first to review!

CLOSED NOW

Today: 8:30 am - 5:00 pm

Tomorrow: 8:30 am - 5:00 pm

22 Years

in Business

(817) 377-8833Call Visit WebsiteVisit Website Map & DirectionsDirections6300 Ridglea PlFort Worth, TX 76116 Write a ReviewWrite Review

Is this your business?

Customize this page.

Claim This Business

Hours

Regular Hours

Mon - Fri:	8:30 am - 5:00 pm

Tanner Associates

Criminal Defense
The term “good faith” means that the employee believed that the conduct reported was a violation of law and the employee’s belief was reasonable in light of the employee’s training and experience. An employee’s mistaken belief that she is reporting a violation of law to the appropriate law enforcement authority is still in good faith, and she may still be protected by the Act, if the employee believes the governmental entity is authorized to either regulate under or enforce the law alleged to have been violated in the report or to investigate or prosecute a violation of criminal law

View All Services

Provided by

Places Near Fort Worth with Attorneys

Sansom Park (9 miles)
Samson Park (9 miles)

More Info

Email

Extra Phones

Phone: (817) 332-8844

Location

Mutual of Omaha Bank Bldg

Neighborhood

AKA

Tanner & Associates PC

Rod Tanner & Associates

ROD TANNER ASSOC

Tanner Rod

Other Links

http://www.rodtannerlaw.com

https://www.rodtannerlaw.com/contact.html

Categories

Attorneys, Business Law Attorneys, Business Litigation Attorneys, Criminal Law Attorneys, Discrimination & Civil Rights Law Attorneys, Employee Benefits & Worker Compensation Attorneys, Employment Discrimination Attorneys, Immigration Law Attorneys, Labor & Employment Law Attorneys, Legal Service Plans, Litigation & Tort Attorneys, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Attorneys, Sexual Harassment Attorneys, Workers Compensation Assistance

Gallery

Be the first to add a photo!

Reviews

Hi there!
Be the first to review!

Click to Rate

Details

Phone: (817) 377-8833

Address: 6300 Ridglea Pl, Fort Worth, TX 76116

Website: http://www.rodtannerlaw.com

People Also Viewed

View similar Attorneys

Suggest an Edit

Tanner Associates

Criminal Defense
The term “good faith” means that the employee believed that the conduct reported was a violation of law and the employee’s belief was reasonable in light of the employee’s training and experience. An employee’s mistaken belief that she is reporting a violation of law to the appropriate law enforcement authority is still in good faith, and she may still be protected by the Act, if the employee believes the governmental entity is authorized to either regulate under or enforce the law alleged to have been violated in the report or to investigate or prosecute a violation of criminal law
Sex Crimes
It is common for employers to draft agreements conditional on the signee’s consent to arbitrate any and all claims arising from their relationship with the employer, often impeding just for sexual assault survivors. More than half of American workers—56%—are subject to mandatory arbitration. 60 million Americans have signed such clauses.
Fraud
After the Enron and WorldCom scandals of 2002, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which extended protections to public whistleblowers outside the government sector. The Act protects any employee of a public company who reports wrongdoing related to securities fraud, shareholder fraud, bank fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, or any other violation of an SEC rule or regulation.
Assault

Business and Corporate Law

Business Disputes
Rod Tanner established the firm in 1999 with the singular objective of providing superior legal service in major labor, employment and business disputes. Tanner is Board Certified in labor and employment law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and has extensive experience in trials and appeals in federal and state courts, administrative proceedings before federal and state agencies, labor arbitration and in mediation.
Trade Secrets

Workers Compensation
Wrongful Termination
Although the employment-at-will doctrine permits employers to terminate employees for any reason, the reason must be legal. Federal and state laws exist to protect at-will employees from wrongful termination.
Employment Discrimination
Age discrimination occurs when an employee or applicant is treated less favorably than similarly situated employees or applicants because of his or her age.
Employment Contract
The bill is retroactive, meaning it applies even to employment contracts written and entered into prior to the bill’s passing.
Employment Litigation
Federal courts in Texas have been busy this year, issuing many significant decisions impacting employment litigation that employees should be cognizant of, as many of these decisions are precedent-setting and impact an employee’s ability to establish a prima facie case.
Non-compete Agreement
A non-compete clause, or a non-compete agreement, is a contract between an employee and an employer in which the employee agrees not to enter into direct competition with the employer during or after employment, regardless of whether the employee is terminated or resigns. The employee is also barred from revealing any trade secrets learned during employment. Many times, these agreements are presented to employees on a take-it-or-leave-it basis, meaning employees must agree to the contract as a term of employment.
Severance Agreement
Be in exchange for valuable consideration in addition to anything of value to which you are already entitled, such as a larger severance package or additional benefits.
Sexual Harassment
Our firm has recently blogged about Senate Bill 45 and its potential impact on sexual harassment claims in Texas. This blog addresses a collateral issue that employees should consider when filing their sexual harassment lawsuits.

Immigration Law

Citizenship and Naturalization

Disability Discrimination
Dillard v. SNC-Lavalin Engineers & Constructors Inc., __ S.W.3 __, 2021 WL 2149219 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2021, held that a plaintiff’s allegation that he had diabetes and took medication for diabetes, standing alone, did not create an issue of fact whether he was disabled because he failed to show the diabetes caused him to be “substantially limited.”

View All Services

Provided by